![]() I do not think, like others, that because it requires installing some other KDE dependencies, that it is not worth trying on other non-kde desktops. So, you have to install some "kde" dependencies to really have it work on non-KDE desktops. I personally think "Dolphin" is the best file manager of all of them for the reasons already stated, but it is a KDE application. For a text based console terminal file manager I think "mc" (midnight commander) is pretty great.įor a desktop (graphical GUI) file manager, I agree with most everyone else, that using the one that comes with the edition of Linux Mint you are using is the best way to go. "Ranger" is a text based console terminal file manager, if I am not mistaken. I just read your post and the good replies to it. the reason I use Mint Xfce instead of LXDE on my netbook is that no good Ubuntu based distros I know of offer an LXDE version with 5 years support. ![]() It's very fast, reasonably powerful, and doesn't install a lot of dependencies. One that I might consider is pcmanfm, which is the LXDE file manager. I have installed Dolphin on non KDE DE versions before but no more. It's fine now.ĭolphin is indeed very powerful but if you install it in a non KDE DE it'll also install a shed load of dependencies. I'm an Xfce user and I used to feel that way about Thunar but they improved it. ![]() ![]() Having tried all the Mint DE versions I don't actually think any of their file managers is anywhere near bad enough to make it worthwhile using a different one. You're going to get better integration with the file manager that came with the DE. All41 wrote:The embedded file manager is the most defining characteristic among the Mint DEs,Īnd each DE offers compelling features-if I were to choose a file manager based on navigational attributes ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |